power


Coming out of WWII, organizations leveraged the military’s use of power hierarchy to structure themselves. It was familiar and aligned with theories of management at the time (think Taylor, Weber). In this military model, position carries authority over others. To move “up the ladder,” one must be promoted by power into power; invited into supervisory, management, director, and executive positions at power’s discretion.

Leadership, on the other hand, is granted by followers. Followers decide the leaders they follow. This begs the question: why has organizational hierarchal power been granted the nomenclature of “leadership?” True, there are those who build leadership capacity and bring it to the power they are granted, and there are even organizations that develop the leadership skills of chosen performers. Yet, this still feels like a “cart before the horse” approach: star performers promoted into power by power with little regard for whether the resulting followers consider them leaders.

We would do better to treat power as a component of leadership rather than leadership itself. Power alone can be daunting and bring about unwelcome characteristics, precisely because leadership development is lacking in advance of a promotion to power. And here’s the thing: leadership essentials are also essential to healthy followership. So why not provide development of the essentials – self and other awareness, accountability, integrity, presence, effective communication, including listening and feedback – to leaders and followers alike?

By offering everyone the opportunity to develop essential skills, an organization may reap the benefits of healthy leadership and followership. After all, depending on each situation and its human dynamics, each of us encounters reasons to lead and follow, be it in work or life, each and every day.

When power in and of itself can be addictive and difficult to relinquish, what better way to potentially allay such addiction than to develop essential skills in everyone from the very start?

I have come to observe just how much US society revolves around an apparent obsession with power. It is craved and otherwise admired, even coveted. So much so that we seem to conflate it with leadership. As in, that person has power, let’s put them in charge! And how’s that worked out for us, ever?

Though power, and the ability to understand and temper it in a variety of forms, is an aspect of leadership, power is not leadership’s equal. And we do a disservice to all involved when anyone promoted is unprepared to wield the power granted. In fact, it would be beneficial if all employees regardless of promotion potential were granted opportunities to develop essential skills often reserved for those who are promoted to positional power:

  • Self-Awareness
  • Emotional Regulation/Intelligence
  • Effective Communication
  • Integrity and Accountability
  • Power Dynamics
  • Adapting to Change
  • and others

Because these are all essential skills to being an effective human not just an effective leader. And since these take time and social interaction to develop, that development needs to start well before, and should be a prerequisite for, promotion. More employees with these skills means better recognition of them which can lead to better workplaces. Plus, being commutable, who doesn’t want better neighborhoods and communities to boot?

Know better. Do better. Be better.